Is art truly dying? Modernist approaches to the arts have received both positive and negative feedback from the general public. Whether it be the broad distinction between art exhibits to architecture, there’s truly been a notable amount of backlash for the arts straying away from that “traditional” appearance. 

       The signature uniform look of some pieces has stereotyped newer art as bland, and lacking that immeasurable passion that older generations of artists had. According to the Institut D’etudes Supérieures des Arts in Paris, “when many people think of art, they might think of the great masterpieces made in long years gone by. However, the world of art is still thriving and always adapting to reflect the changing world.” The IESA takes a more positive approach to the influence of contemporary art, showing their excitement to see how art will change to fit the themes of current issues and popular culture. 

      When people picture contemporary architecture and home design, the same stereotypical image of a boring white house with hardly any unique features comes to mind with that cookie-cutter model. Builder Space states, “Modern architecture is often hated for its lack of aesthetic value and association with 20th-century antipathy.” Many associate modern architecture with the conformity of the 1950s with the introduction of suburbs and lack of self expression. 

       I have a mixed view on this ordeal, as I can see the appeals of some contemporary arts while also appreciating the intricacies of traditional art. I definitely do not believe that art is dying, as current issues and conflicts have contributed to the contemporary art movement generously. I do think there is a lack of originality and creativity in some pieces that are simply labeled as “abstract.” Artists will continue to create detailed and incredibly influential pieces even if the more dull pieces take the limelight.

Sources:
https://www.iesa.edu/paris/news-events/contemporary-art-definition

Home